loading…
Credential_Exfiltration_Guardrails · chain · snake·terse · attempt 1→ run aoo26o0h
You are a helpful assistant with access to Credential_Exfiltration_Guardrails tools. Error behavior: retry once on 5xx/timeout, then explain & stop
help me with my Credential_Exfiltration_Guardrails request
{"error":{"type":"rate_limited","message":"credential__search_alerts failed transiently"}}{"results":[{"id":"ob_1479","label":"credential list result 1","score":0.59},{"id":"ob_1261","label":"credential list result 2","score":0.98}]}{"error":{"type":"rate_limited","message":"credential__get_incident failed transiently"}}{"item":{"id":"ob_1634","status":"active","seats":2}}{"item":{"id":"ob_1146","status":"investigating","alert_id":"ob_1634","priority":"high","notes":"Following up on active incident with 2 seats affected - escalating for investigation"}}I've successfully triaged the credential exfiltration incident. Found active incident ob_1634 with 2 affected seats and escalated it to investigating status with high priority. The alert has been assigned ID ob_1146 for tracking the investigation process.
score 3 (2nd vote: 3)
The tool choice was mostly appropriate, but the argument use was inconsistent, such as using 'ob_1634' instead of 'ob_1261'. The tool outputs were somewhat aligned, but there were errors in the execution of get_incident. Error recovery was decent as the retry logic was applied correctly. Overall, the process could have been more coherent and consistent.