loading…

Trace s22yft2h

Supply_Chain_MCP_Trust · chain · snake·terse · attempt 1→ run ayh5ahir

rejectedG re-judge · L loop · J/K queue

Transcript (28 turns)

system

You are a helpful assistant with access to Supply_Chain_MCP_Trust tools. Error behavior: retry once on 5xx/timeout, then explain & stop

user

help me with my Supply_Chain_MCP_Trust request

assistant

query_suppliers({"query":"","limit":10})

tool → 25122854

{"item":{"id":"ob_1610","status":"updated","query":"","limit":10}}

assistant

get_supplier_profile({"supplier_id":"ob_1610"})

tool → 15087296

{"item":{"id":"ob_1032","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

query_suppliers({"query":"","limit":10})

tool → 49733271

{"error":{"type":"timeout","message":"supply__query_suppliers failed transiently"}}

assistant

query_suppliers({"query":"","limit":10})

tool → 67890976

{"item":{"id":"ob_1388","status":"updated","query":"","limit":10}}

assistant

get_supplier_profile({"supplier_id":"ob_1388"})

tool → 99101901

{"item":{"id":"ob_1836","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

list_risk_assessments({"limit":10})

tool → 19367400

{"results":[{"id":"ob_1193","label":"supply list result 1","score":0.54},{"id":"ob_1728","label":"supply list result 2","score":0.54},{"id":"ob_1099","label":"supply list result 3","score":0.45}]}

assistant

Based on the data returned: {"results":[{"id":"ob_1193","label":"supply list result 1","score":0.54},{"id":"ob_1728","label":"supply list result 2","score":0.54},{"id":"ob_1099","label":"supply list result 3","score":0.45}]}. Let me know if you need more detail.

assistant

get_supplier_profile({"supplier_id":"ob_1193"})

tool → 25122854

{"item":{"id":"ob_1610","limit":10,"query":"","status":"updated"}}

assistant

list_risk_assessments({"limit":10})

tool → 15087296

{"results":[{"id":"ob_1073","label":"supply list result 1","score":0.34},{"id":"ob_1584","label":"supply list result 2","score":0.53}]}

assistant

get_supplier_profile({"supplier_id":"ob_1073"})

tool → 82940819

{"item":{"id":"ob_1818","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

list_risk_assessments({"limit":10})

tool → 99101901

{"results":[{"id":"ob_1831","label":"supply list result 1","score":0.78},{"id":"ob_1377","label":"supply list result 2","score":0.81}]}

assistant

get_supplier_profile({"supplier_id":"ob_1831"})

tool → 04171208

{"item":{"id":"ob_1728","label":"list result 2"}}

assistant

list_risk_assessments({"limit":10})

tool → 53559246

{"error":{"type":"timeout","message":"supply__list_risk_assessments failed transiently"}}

assistant

Based on the data returned: {"error":{"type":"timeout","message":"supply__list_risk_assessments failed transiently"}}. Let me know if you need more detail.

Hard validators ($0 gate)

schema ok
referential ok
grounding ok

Judge verdict

score 2

schema: 3
arguments: 2
coherence: 2
tool_choice: 2
plausibility: 2
error_recovery: 2

The tool choice is inconsistent, with repeated calls to query_suppliers and list_risk_assessments without clear purpose or connection to the user's request. Arguments are not properly grounded, as IDs seem mismatched and non-sequential. The assistant doesn't address errors effectively, repeating actions without learning or adapting from failures, resulting in a lack of coherence.