Trace g8ghg69x

Prompt_Injection_Defense · chain · dotted·terse · attempt 2→ run 89zqqen3

rejectedG re-judge · L loop · J/K queue

lineage: ujhpj3 → ghg69x

Transcript (15 turns)

system

You are a helpful assistant with access to Prompt_Injection_Defense tools. Error behavior: retry once on 5xx/timeout, then explain & stop

user

help me with my Prompt_Injection_Defense request

assistant

list_detections({"limit":10,"time_range":"24h"})

tool → 23339714

{"results":[]}

assistant

search_indicators({"query":"prompt injection","limit":10,"time_range":"24h"})

tool → 32414181

{"results":[{"id":"ob_1770","label":"prompt search result 1","score":0.86}]}

assistant

get_detection({"detection_id":"ob_1770","include_payload":true,"include_response":true})

tool → 99272827

{"item":{"id":"ob_1428","status":"active","seats":4}}

assistant

analyze_bypass({"payload":"ob_1428","analysis_depth":"standard"})

tool → 36118034

{"item":{"id":"ob_1254","status":"updated","payload":"ob_1428","analysis_depth":"standard"}}

assistant

get_detection({"detection_id":"ob_1254","include_payload":true,"include_response":true})

tool → 20012182

{"item":{"id":"ob_1453","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

list_detections({"limit":10,"time_range":"24h"})

tool → 80064255

{"results":[{"id":"ob_1795","label":"prompt list result 1","score":0.41}]}

assistant

Based on the data returned: {"results":[{"id":"ob_1795","label":"prompt list result 1","score":0.41}]}. Let me know if you need more detail.

Hard validators ($0 gate)

schema ok
referential ok
grounding ok

Judge verdict

score 2

schema: 3
arguments: 2
coherence: 2
tool_choice: 2
plausibility: 2
error_recovery: 2

The trace shows a sequence of tool calls that lacks coherence and proper error recovery. The tool choice appears inconsistent, especially with repeated 'get_detection' calls without clear reasoning. Arguments are not well-grounded, and the final response does not logically follow from the tool outputs.