Trace u3f9ds34

AI_Agent_Security_Redteam · chain · dotted·terse · attempt 3→ run 2l2b2rzu

rejectedG re-judge · L loop · J/K queue

lineage: 8a2bme → 7j391r → f9ds34

Transcript (15 turns)

system

You are a helpful assistant with access to AI_Agent_Security_Redteam tools. Error behavior: retry once on 5xx/timeout, then explain & stop

user

help me with my AI_Agent_Security_Redteam request

assistant

query_vulnerabilities({"limit":10})

tool → 47929544

{"item":{"id":"ob_1762","status":"updated","limit":10}}

assistant

get_exploit_by_id({"exploit_id":"ob_1762","include_payloads":true,"include_mitigations":true})

tool → 05906274

{"item":{"id":"ob_1726","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

query_vulnerabilities({"limit":10})

tool → 27960688

{"error":{"type":"timeout","message":"ai__query_vulnerabilities failed transiently"}}

assistant

query_vulnerabilities({"limit":10})

tool → 65464102

{"item":{"id":"ob_1562","status":"updated","limit":10}}

assistant

get_exploit_by_id({"exploit_id":"ob_1562","include_payloads":true,"include_mitigations":true})

tool → 77897777

{"item":{"id":"ob_1087","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

list_attack_scenarios({"status":"approved"})

tool → 40481152

{"results":[]}

assistant

Based on the data returned: {"results":[]}. Let me know if you need more detail.

Hard validators ($0 gate)

schema ok
referential ok
grounding ok

Judge verdict

score 2

schema: 4
arguments: 2
coherence: 2
tool_choice: 2
plausibility: 2
error_recovery: 3

The tool usage is confusing and lacks coherence. The assistant calls 'query_vulnerabilities' multiple times without using the results effectively. The 'get_exploit_by_id' calls use IDs that don't match schema expectations. The response to a timeout is appropriate but the overall tool choice doesn't align well with the user's request, indicating a lack of clear objectives.