Trace zqs4hfzy

Prompt_Injection_Defense · chain · verbfirst·verbose · attempt 3→ run 89zqqen3

judgedA/R triage · G re-judge · L loop · E edit · J/K queue

lineage: ulu48a → tytn2e → s4hfzy

Transcript (11 turns)

system

You are a helpful assistant with access to Prompt_Injection_Defense tools. Error behavior: retry once on 5xx/timeout, then explain & stop

user

help me with my Prompt_Injection_Defense request

assistant

list_detections({"limit":10})

tool → 30648902

{"error":{"type":"not_found","message":"prompt__list_detections failed transiently"}}

assistant

list_detections({"limit":10})

tool → 67737307

{"results":[{"id":"ob_1454","label":"prompt list result 1","score":0.47},{"id":"ob_1852","label":"prompt list result 2","score":1}]}

assistant

get_detection({"detection_id":"ob_1852","include_payload":true,"include_response":true})

tool → 31094805

{"error":{"type":"timeout","message":"prompt__get_detection failed transiently"}}

assistant

get_detection({"detection_id":"ob_1852","include_payload":true,"include_response":true})

tool → 81823283

{"item":{"id":"ob_1840","status":"active","seats":3}}

assistant

I found detection record ob_1852 from the list, but when retrieving its details, the system returned a different record (ob_1840) with status 'active' and 3 seats. This appears to be a data inconsistency issue in the detection system.

Hard validators ($0 gate)

schema ok
referential ok
grounding ok

Judge verdict

score 3 (2nd vote: 3)

schema: 4
arguments: 2
coherence: 3
tool_choice: 4
plausibility: 3
error_recovery: 3

The trace shows appropriate tool choices but suffers from ungrounded arguments and data inconsistency. The assistant correctly retries transient errors but does not fully address the mismatch between detection IDs, impacting coherence and error recovery.